Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Calendar Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parents urge schedule, childcare and staffing priorities; community member questions tennis‑court spending
Summary
At public comment April 19, 2025, parents urged the Newberry County Board to consider working parents when setting the school calendar, questioned graduation timing and asked the district to help students find summer jobs. A community member raised budget concerns about proposed tennis courts.
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Calendar Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Two community members used the board’s public forum April 19, 2025, to raise concerns about the school calendar, childcare costs, graduation timing, student work opportunities and proposed athletics spending.
Tyler Johnson, a parent of two elementary students at Calmeria Garvey, urged the board to consider the challenges working parents face with the district’s modified calendar and added breaks, saying childcare is typically purchased as an annual package in the county and short gaps create burdens. He also said the district should do more to connect high school students with summer jobs and internships and questioned scheduling graduations before the end of the school year, which he said creates conflicts for families with multiple children.
“Why are we having graduations prior to the end of the school year, creating scheduling conflicts for parents with multiple children, one graduating, one still in class?” Johnson said. He thanked the board and staff for stewardship of the budget and asked the board to ensure principals and school‑level staff are compensated so they are not lost to district office positions for financial reasons.
Mr. Forsberg said he agreed with previous comments and expressed concern about district spending priorities after hearing a rumor the district might build tennis courts. Forsberg said a single tennis project could represent a high per‑player cost and questioned whether those funds would better serve classroom instruction or teacher pay.
Board members acknowledged the comments. The public forum remarks were not tied to formal board action at the April 19 meeting, but board members said the concerns would inform budget and calendar discussions going forward.

