Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hooper planning commission reconsiders flag‑lot policy; asks public works and fire input
Summary
Commissioners reviewed sample flag‑lot language from other cities, raised emergency‑access and addressing concerns and asked staff to gather technical input from public works and the Weber Fire District before proceeding.
The Hooper City Planning Commission discussed proposed language for flag‑lot (flag‑lot = lots with a narrow access stem) regulations and asked staff to gather technical input from public works and fire officials before the commission pursues ordinance changes.
Commissioners reviewed sample ordinances from other cities and remarked that some cities simply do not favor creating new flag lots by subdivision and limit flag‑lot allowances to existing land‑locked situations. One commissioner said Clean Cities’ sample appeared the most conservative because it would require a conditional use permit in many cases.
Commissioners and staff raised several practical concerns: emergency‑vehicle access, addressing for new dwellings, long shared drives and future subdivision pressure if sewer and services expand. One commissioner summarized a phone conversation with the Weber Fire District, reporting that standards can vary but that the fire district often requires a 20‑foot turnaround for drives about 150 feet long and generally prefers structures to be within roughly 600 feet of a fire hydrant; the commissioner added that the district sometimes allows exceptions on a case‑by‑case basis and may require on‑site fire suppression measures.
The group discussed sample threshold language in some model ordinances that would limit flag lots to a parcel where the new lot would be, for example, no larger than 125%–135% of a zone’s lot size requirement, and the possibility of limiting flag‑lot approvals to a single instance (one flag lot) on a parent parcel rather than permitting multiple new lots created by subdivision. Commissioners expressed concern that loosening rules could lead to many piecemeal flag‑lot subdivisions 10–20 years later as services extend, creating shared‑drive disputes and access problems.
Commissioners asked staff to do targeted follow‑up: invite Jared from public works to a future meeting to review utility and roadway implications; gather written input from the Weber Fire District and other relevant agencies; review the historical reasons the city previously restricted flag lots; and gauge the elected officials’ interest before drafting ordinance language. A staff speaker agreed to invite Jared to the next meeting and said staff will gather the requested input.
No formal motion or ordinance change was made at the meeting; the item remained a discussion topic and staff follow‑up was requested.
