Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cotati council introduces updated parks code to standardize signs, leash rules and permits; first reading passes
Summary
Council members completed the first reading to update multiple municipal code chapters on parks, animal control and permits. Changes include clarifying leash rules (6‑foot leash), moving park hours to a council policy, removing a senior dog‑license exemption from the ordinance and tightening permitting rules for amplified sound and special events;
The Cotati City Council held a public hearing and introduced by first reading a comprehensive update to several municipal code chapters governing parks, animals and special events. The ordinance—amending sections across Chapters 4, 7 and 9—passed the first reading on council motion and will return for a second reading.
Why it matters: The changes are intended to provide consistent park signage and permitting processes across Cotati’s renovated parks, reduce redundant or conflicting code language, and clarify enforceable rules (leash length, amplified sound, permitted hours and permit procedures).
Major changes discussed and direction to staff
- Leash and animal control: The draft pulls leash rules into Chapter 7.24 and clarifies that animals must be on a six‑foot leash and under the handler’s control in all public places unless an area is specifically designated off‑leash (dog parks). The draft also clarifies that dogs are prohibited from special‑use sports facilities unless signage designates otherwise.
- Dogs at festivals and events: A prior ordinance section that broadly prohibited dogs at festivals was removed; the revised code defers to leash rules and specific permit signage for animal access at events.
- Senior dog‑license exemption removed from code: Staff and council noted Cotati’s transition to the DocuPet licensing system means the old “first dog free for seniors” provision no longer aligns with current licensing mechanics. Council directed staff to remove the senior‑exemption clause from the ordinance and handle any senior discounts through the city fee schedule/DocuPet process.
- Park hours: Council agreed to move “park open hours” out of a specific numeric reference in code and instead set them by council policy; staff will return with a proposed policy and sample hours and the updated sign program. Council members expressed concern about signing clarity and the practical effect of closing parks at dusk in winter months; the council directed staff to set park hours by policy so staff can research comparable jurisdictions and propose readable sign language.
- Amplified sound and permit procedures: The ordinance clarifies that amplified sound is not allowed without a permit and adds permit procedures intended to respect free‑speech protections while preserving the city’s ability to manage amplified events. The code also consolidates inconsistent references across park signage and code chapters.
- Projectiles and hazardous activities: The updated language replaces a long list of examples (model airplanes, archery, baseballs) with a concise prohibition on activities “in which a projectile may pose a threat to safety (e.g., archery, driving of golf balls), except in places provided for such purposes,” to make enforcement clearer and technology‑neutral.
- Minor corrections and cleanup: The draft removes redundant provisions, fixes typographical errors flagged by council members and updates code references so signs will point to consistent sections.
Public comment and council input
No members of the public spoke in favor or opposition during the hearing. Council and staff discussed operational details, including the logistics of a DocuPet licensing refund process for seniors (staff noted senior licensing costs are currently low under DocuPet and suggested handling the senior discount outside the ordinance), and whether the drone‑related language should be specific; staff recommended leaving drones unenumerated and treating hazardous projectiles by risk of harm rather than explicit device lists.
Vote and next steps
Councilmember motioned to introduce the ordinance with the discussed edits (removal of the senior‑exemption clause from the ordinance, moving park hours to policy, and revised projectile language). The first reading passed on a 5‑0 vote. Staff will return with the second reading of the ordinance and an implementation plan for new park signage and fee‑policy alignment.
Speakers quoted or heard on record: city staff (presenter identified in the hearing), Damien (staff), Chief Veliquette (public safety input), council members (Harvey, Sparks, Lemus), and members of the public who asked technical questions about enforcement and signage.
