Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Food Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves amendments to Thurston County Board of Health sanitary code Articles 1 and 2 governing food services
Summary
After outreach to the food industry, the Board of Health held a public hearing and approved amendments to Articles 1 and 2 of the sanitary code to align with state WAC 246-215, add civil penalties for unpermitted operations, and streamline certain permitting processes; staff reported outreach metrics and no public comments were received before the
The Thurston County Board of Health on Oct. 14 held a public hearing and approved amendments to Article 1 (general provisions/enforcement) and Article 2 (food services) of the county sanitary code. The revisions align local rules with state WAC 246-215, clarify local requirements, broaden enforcement authority, add civil-penalty language for unpermitted operations and streamline permitting for catering and temporary events.
Public outreach: Susan Long, environmental health division director, said staff compiled a list of 1,262 individuals associated with the food industry (permit holders, consultants and plan submitters) and sent bilingual (English/Spanish) emails on Sept. 5 inviting comment. Long reported email metrics: 1,262 emails sent, 661 opened, 32 clicks on the English summary of changes, 40 clicks on the Spanish summary and 70 clicks into the public comment portal; two Facebook posts garnered 1,128 views. Long told the board they had received zero public comments prior to the hearing.
Program highlights: Jesse Smith, food program manager, summarized substantive changes: removal of duplicative local food worker card language that is covered by state law; streamlining language for restaurants that add catering to ease temporary festival paperwork; and adding civil penalties to Article 2 to address unpermitted operations (Article 1 already contained some civil-infraction language). Smith said, "Those are the big changes, I would say."
Public hearing and vote: With no public commenters present, the board closed the public hearing and then moved to adopt the ordinance amending Articles 1 and 2. A motion to approve the ordinance was made and seconded; the board voted in favor with no recorded opposition and the motion was approved.
Why it matters: The changes bring county regulations into alignment with state sanitation code provisions, clarify enforcement options for unpermitted food operations, and reduce paperwork barriers for permitted facilities doing temporary events. Staff emphasized outreach to industry stakeholders (bilingual notices and direct emails) ahead of the hearing.
Next steps: The adopted amendments will be codified by staff and enforcement will proceed under the updated code; no new funding or fines schedule was presented at the meeting. Environmental Health will continue outreach and implementation with permit holders.
