Votes at a glance: Weber County Planning Commission (design reviews, rezones)
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
Summary of planning commission actions taken at the meeting: two design reviews and two rezoning recommendations forwarded to the county commission (development agreement follow‑up required).
Key outcomes from the Weber County Planning Commission meeting (actions recommended to county staff/commission):
- DR‑2025‑12 (Design review — two light‑manufacturing buildings, M‑1 zone): Planning commission recommended approval conditioned on completion of agency reviews (county engineering, fire district) and submission of a landscaping plan; written approval withheld until conditions met (motion passed unanimously).
- DR‑2025‑07 (Design review — 23,800‑sq‑ft fabrication shop, M‑1 zone): Planning commission recommended approval with conditions requiring agency sign‑offs, a zero‑scape landscaping plan prior to written approval, and guarantees before occupancy; commissioners emphasized hard surfacing for loading and fire access (motion passed unanimously).
- CDA/CMA (C‑2 boundary expansion at 1402 South / 4700 West): Planning commission recommended approval of a legislative rezoning to expand the C‑2 boundary and forwarded a development agreement (Exhibit A) that clarifies right‑of‑way dedications (132 ft on 4700 West, 80 ft on 1400 South), treatment of legal nonconforming structures and complete‑street triggers; recommendation forwarded to the county commission (motion passed on roll call recommendation).
- Halcyon Estates rezoning (10‑acre parcel A‑1 to R‑1‑15): Planning commission recommended approval of rezoning for the 10‑acre parcel and adjacent Phase‑2 area, with commission‑requested conditions including a $7,500 per‑lot parks donation (applied to existing and new lots within the rezoned footprint), a 3‑year development agreement term with a 1‑year extension, pathway connectivity expectations and donation/transfer of surplus water to the parks district; the motion carried by majority and will be forwarded to the county commission for final action.
All motions were recorded by the planning commission; final legal authority and implementation will be set by written development agreements and the county commission’s decision.