Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Reorganization topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Teaneck board elects new leadership, approves consent items and limits public comment at reorganization meeting
Summary
At its Jan. 7 reorganization meeting, the Teaneck Board of Education swore in newly elected trustees, elected a president and vice president, approved several consent items and contracts, referred a decorum policy to committee, and voted to limit public comment and set a 45-minute cap on an executive-session block.
Teaneck Board of Education members met in person and via Zoom on Jan. 7 for the district's reorganization meeting and swore in newly elected trustees before selecting board leadership and voting on a set of administrative items.
Dr. Victor Anaya, the board secretary, opened the meeting and administered the oaths of office to the newly elected trustees, including Jennifer Levy and Jonathan Rodriguez. "I especially want to thank my mom... my wonderful husband, Shayan, my kids," Trustee Jennifer Levy said during brief remarks after being sworn in.
The board then held nominations and roll-call votes for the 2025 officers. After two rounds of nominations and votes, members elected Ed Hoff as board president and Cassandra (Cassandra/Tassandra) Reyes as vice president. The president-elect addressed the meeting, saying, "I am truly humbled by this responsibility," and laid out priorities including healing, engagement, improving meetings and pursuing a bond referendum.
On routine business the board approved large portions of the consent agenda after trustees agreed to pull several items for separate discussion. Trustees voted to amend the public-notice language used for meeting postings to include a digital option while retaining a printed notice, with the board attorney preparing formal language for the motion.
Trustees amended the 2025 meeting calendar to change a June meeting date (June 18 moved to June 11) and to consolidate October into a single combined workshop/regular meeting in response to holiday and conference scheduling conflicts. The board also discussed but did not finalize a proposed shift in the timing of the board retreat, choosing to revisit that schedule later.
The board voted to adopt the district's code of ethics and to send a proposed decorum/"deportment" policy to the policy committee for drafting that would set expectations for public conduct and board member behavior at meetings. Trustee Jerry (Dr.) Kirschenbaum said he wanted a policy in place promptly; other trustees recommended handling the drafting at the policy committee and moving it to the full board quickly.
On professional services and contracts, the board confirmed a set of existing professional providers (item 17) and approved the district's primary pediatrician contract (item 18). Several trustees raised questions about the scope and cost of the pediatrician contract (one trustee said the contract amount was about $83,000 and requested clarification of duties) and discussed issuing requests for proposals (RFPs) for professional services in the future.
Trustees also approved the district's human-resources and benefits contract items (including item 20) while several trustees urged staff to consider RFPs and to pursue wellness programs aimed at managing rising health-care costs.
The board changed meeting procedures: trustees voted to move the first executive-session block to immediately follow the first public-comment period and to limit that post-public-comment executive session to 45 minutes; they also voted to cap combined public-comment time at 30 minutes (with the board able to extend that limit if it chooses). The board attorney advised that any change that affects written board policies will require corresponding policy amendments.
During the second public-comment period residents raised several topics. Deborah Blayberg urged fiscal transparency and asked, "I hope we're going to find out where all this extra money keeps coming from and why taxpayers are being overtaxed." A Teaneck resident identified as Shanaz urged the board to consider whether its membership reflects the district's student demographics and raised allegations concerning a named trustee; the board did not act on those allegations during the meeting. Other residents urged greater outreach and suggested parliamentary-procedure training for trustees.
The board closed the regular-session business and moved toward adjournment. Several trustees and members of the public emphasized the need to maintain focus on students while improving meeting efficiency and transparency.
Ending: The board will carry follow-up items (policy drafting, clarification of contracts and potential RFPs, meeting-calendar details and bond-referral planning) to committee work in the coming weeks.
