Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks Recreation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee backs exploring year-round float-plane model at Chicory Ridge Park; rules and storage to be developed

5951929 · June 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee supported exploring a year-round allowance for radio-control float planes at Chicory Ridge Park, directing staff to work with the flying club on draft rules, permits and insurance requirements; the club offered to fund a small retrieval craft and container storage.

The Village of Roscoe Committee of the Whole discussed a request from a radio-control float-plane flying club to designate Chicory Ridge Park’s pond as a year-round flying field for permitted electric float planes and recommended pursuing the idea further.

Staff said the pond and immediate airspace have been used for occasional fly-ins for several years and that an FAA-designated flying area already covers the water for model aircraft operations. The proposed program would mirror the county model for flying fields: pilots would obtain a village permit, show proof of membership in the Academy of Model Aeronautics (AMA) and provide evidence of liability insurance (AMA insurance typically includes $1 million liability), and be required to follow a village rule set that limits model weight and fuel type. "We would require AMA membership, insurance and a permit; only permitted pilots would be allowed to fly," staff said.

The club said it would provide volunteer safety boats for retrieval of waterborne models and has offered to fund a small locked container to hold a retrieval dinghy and safety equipment. Staff said liability language, seasonal limits (no flying when ice is present), noise and weight restrictions (electric-only models, weight limits discussed) and an enrollment/permit system would be required. Trustees suggested limiting operations seasonally (e.g., March–November), requiring two-person operation during flights, and setting a cap on concurrent aircraft to reduce crowding.

The committee asked staff to work with the club to draft rules and a permit process and to bring a formal proposal to the Board. The club will provide draft rules for staff review; staff will prepare an implementation plan that includes required insurance and signage and identifies an area for locked container storage.

Why it matters: The proposal would formalize a recurring recreational activity, create a defined permit process, and require safety and insurance safeguards. It offers a new recreational amenity for hobbyists with limited operational impact if rules are enforced.

What’s next: Staff will work with the flying club to produce draft rules, insurance verification procedures, a site plan for storage, and any required permit language for a future Board hearing.