Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement Cmr topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Needham school committee votes to pursue Construction Manager at Risk under Chapter 149A
Summary
The School Building Committee voted to apply to the state Inspector General to use Chapter 149A construction manager at risk (CMR) delivery for the project; the committee recorded a roll-call vote and discussed schedule and preconstruction costs.
The Needham School Building Committee voted Oct. 6 to pursue a construction-manager-at-risk (CMR) delivery under Chapter 149A for the Powell (Pollard) Middle School project, authorizing staff to file an application with the state Inspector General and begin the procurement steps required for a CMR selection.
Committee members and the owner’s project manager described CMR as a delivery method that provides preconstruction estimating, constructability review and scheduling input during design and allows early procurement of long-lead items. The committee’s vote follows staff advice that Pollard’s constrained site and in-place operations make the CMR approach better suited to mitigate risk than a traditional design-bid-build hard-bid process.
Why it matters: the CMR process is a two-phase procurement. The Inspector General’s office normally requires a 60-day review of the application; if the town proceeds, the committee can shortlist contractors, interview finalists and negotiate a guaranteed maximum price (GMP). Committee members noted that preconstruction services typically add cost in the early phase — the team estimated preconstruction fees and related preconstruction estimating work at roughly $150,000–$300,000 depending on scope — but argued that early trade contractor involvement can reduce change orders and delay risk during complex onsite phasing.
Vote and schedule: the committee’s motion to pursue Chapter 149A passed by roll call. Staff said that if the application is filed in October, the earliest an executed CMR contract could be in place would be January–February 2026, subject to the Inspector General’s timing and the town’s procurement schedule.
Process summary: project staff described the typical steps: issue an RFQ to shortlist prime CMs, release an RFP with preconstruction scope and negotiated GMP, and use phased buyouts for long-lead items where appropriate. Committee members discussed market capacity for very large projects and the trade-offs in contractor availability between CMR and design-bid-build on projects of this scale.
Quote: “For projects with this degree of complexity or where we’re building amidst occupied operations, CMR gives you access to construction expertise earlier,” Laro Hill (owner’s project manager) said. Chair Richard Cream and committee members noted the need to budget for preconstruction services and to complete the IG application on the calendar described.
Next steps: staff will finalize and submit the Inspector General application, issue an RFQ and return with a procurement schedule and an estimated preconstruction budget breakdown for committee approval.
