Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tree Code And Staffing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Tree board hears resident concerns about lot clearing, discusses code updates and new urban-forest planner

5952664 · September 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A resident raised concerns about developers clearing lots and planting non-native trees; the board discussed education, a revised tree list that highlights—but does not mandate—native replacements, adjustments to the exceptional-tree protections, and introduced the city's new urban-forest planner, Sam Cole.

A resident urged the Lake Forest Park Tree Board to strengthen public education and to discourage wholesale lot clearing and the replacement of large native trees with smaller, nonnative species. "Most of the new development seems to be clearing entire lots, and I don't really understand the carte blanche to sort of clear the entire lot and then replant with small kind of not equivalent plants," the resident said during public comment.

Board members and the council liaison discussed the city's existing code provisions and the board's pending updates to the tree list. City Council liaison Larry Goldman said the current tree code requires native species to be replaced with native equivalents when a native is removed, and encourages (but does not require) native replacements for removed nonnative trees. Board members said the revised tree list will continue to call out native species but that earlier council hesitancy prevented the list from imposing mandatory replacement requirements.

The board also discussed proposed changes to the "exceptional tree" definition, which would lower the diameter threshold for some species so that more large trees would qualify for the highest protection level. A board member explained the revision is intended to protect a broader cross-section of large trees and to better reflect species-specific size distributions in the city; the board did not adopt a numeric threshold at the meeting but said the change is designed to increase the number of trees that qualify as exceptional.

Staffing and capacity: the board introduced the city's new urban-forest planner, Sam Cole, who started the day before the meeting. Staff said Cole will attend future board meetings and will help implement projects as bandwidth allows. Board members cautioned that the planner and other staff have limited capacity and that decisions about grant-funded work and code amendments should account for staff workload.

Why it matters: public concerns about lot clearing and planting choices affect canopy cover, wildlife habitat and neighborhood character. The board said education, better canopy data and code updates are complementary tools: education to influence homeowner/developer choices; canopy data to target where loss is occurring; and code updates (including a revised tree list and exceptional-tree protections) to change the regulatory baseline.

Next steps: board members said they will finalize the revised tree list and related code amendments and will seek a future council date to introduce the package. They asked staff to coordinate community education efforts and to use updated canopy data to prioritize outreach and preservation strategies.