Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Board Oversight topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board asks staff for multiple follow-up reports: assistant-principal formula, Title I parameters, program evaluations and management review

5954814 · January 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Trustees asked district staff for a series of analyses and reports, including the formula for allocating assistant-principal support, parameters for Title I funds, an evaluation of an in-district tutoring/intervention program, improved clarity on report cards for parents and a scope for a management-assistance review of processes.

Several board members asked staff to prepare reports and return with recommended actions on a range of governance and operational issues.

Member Domínguez requested the formula the district uses to determine which schools receive full or partial assistant-principal support and asked staff to bring the formula and staffing tables for board review at the next meeting. She also asked for a district report detailing the parameters, criteria and exceptions governing Title I fund usage, citing parent concerns that some campuses lack playground equipment while funds roll over.

Trustees requested an evaluation of a small-group intervention/tutoring program (discussed in public comment) to show academic effectiveness and financial implications, including whether the program will continue. Another request asked the superintendent to produce materials that explain report-card scores to parents (a key/legend to help parents interpret a numeric grade scale). The board also sought a scope for a management-assistance review of district processes (procurement, posting and staffing) to identify gaps and recommend improvements.

The board asked staff to consider convening a special meeting late in February focused on roles and responsibilities of board members and to return with a proposed scope and timeline for the requested reviews.