Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cosmetology Outreach topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Advocates support salon poster bill to reach survivors; administration cites existing outreach and implementation questions
Summary
Intro 12-16 would require cosmetology establishments to display information on gender-based violence resources; advocates said salons are trusted spaces, while the administration said outreach is already conducted under Local Law 39 and raised implementation concerns.
Intro 12-16, sponsored by Council Member Linda Lee, would require cosmetology establishments (hair and nail salons) to display posters with information about gender-based-violence resources. The Committee on Women and Gender Equity heard testimony from community-based organizations and the Mayor's Office to End Domestic and Gender-Based Violence (NGBV) on implementation and impact.
Advocates including the Korean American Family Service Center, SAKHI for South Asian Survivors, the Violence Intervention Program and the Asian American Federation said salons and beauty establishments are trusted, culturally familiar spaces where survivors—particularly immigrants and limited-English-proficient people—may safely access information. Andrew Santa Ana of the Asian American Federation urged that posted materials include additional languages beyond the commonly used set and emphasized language access for seniors and limited-English-proficient New Yorkers.
NGBV's commissioner, Saloni Sethi, said the administration supports the intent of Intro 12-16 but noted that outreach to cosmetology establishments is already mandated under Local Law 39 of 2019. NGBV has distributed printed toolkits, posters and palm cards to salons and made resources available online. The administration raised feasibility questions about requiring universal posting and enforcement: current outreach has been opt-in in many cases and is conducted by limited staff whose responsibilities now include multiple priorities.
Committee members asked about the expected number of affected establishments and staffing needs; NGBV said it would follow up with concrete counts and noted staffing vacancies could complicate implementation. The committee also referenced OMB's cost estimate for Intro 14-16 (related data bill) in a separate line of questioning about personnel. No vote was taken; the committee requested follow-up on implementation planning and expected costs.
