Council asks staff to review fencing and setback rules to address safety near arterials and storm channels

The Stanton City Council unanimously reached consensus to have staff review the city's fence, barrier and hedge regulations to identify locations where reduced setbacks or different fence designs would improve public safety and reduce areas used for encampments.

Councilmember Barrios introduced the item asking for an amendment to the city's fencing ordinance (Title 20.31.0 as cited in the meeting) so that commercial and arterial properties could reduce setbacks where necessary to deter loitering and encampments. Council and staff discussed sections that vary by zone and noted that some recent developments already have fences at the sidewalk edge rather than a five‑foot setback. Staff and council members stressed the need to balance safety with aesthetics and avoid a citywide, prison‑like appearance; staff suggested design controls and potential architectural review to ensure beautification and compatibility with the streetscape.

Councilmembers and staff identified locations where setbacks and fencing have been associated with public-safety or nuisance problems, including the corridor south of Beach Boulevard, storm channels and near railway rights-of-way. Councilmembers described case examples where property owners obtained variance approvals to put fences at the sidewalk edge (Motel 6 and other commercial properties) and said those fences have reduced loitering in the specific locations. Councilmembers proposed an approach that would target specific arterial segments and key properties (Beach Boulevard, Katella, Lampson, Western, Magnolia) rather than imposing a citywide rule change.

Staff suggested several policy options: a targeted ordinance or short‑term amendment applicable to identified zones or corridors; a minor‑use‑permit pathway with objective criteria; or a variance/beautification process tied to planning review. The council supported a flexible approach that preserves staff discretion and allows for architectural treatment, and asked staff to return with draft code options and a staff report.

Why it matters: Modifying fence and setback rules could reduce locations where people camp or loiter and could improve safety for businesses and pedestrians if implemented with attention to design and legal constraints.

Next steps: Staff will prepare research, draft code amendments or permit options and a staff report for a future council meeting. Council asked staff to pursue options that are targeted, allow for design review, include a sunset where appropriate, and coordinate with planning and code enforcement.

Provenance: Councilmember Barrios initiated the item and staff discussed specific zoning sections and feasibility; the council voted to give staff direction and requested return with formal recommendations.