Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Committee hears bill to allow electronic rental agreements and clarify termination for self-storage operators

October 17, 2025 | 2025 House Legislature MI, Michigan


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee hears bill to allow electronic rental agreements and clarify termination for self-storage operators
The committee heard testimony on House Bill 47 11, a proposal to modernize the Michigan Self Storage Facility Act by explicitly allowing electronic delivery and acceptance of rental agreements, permitting automatic renewals in certain circumstances, and clarifying disposition procedures after termination or nonrenewal.

Representative Hoadley introduced the bill and described electronic delivery and acceptance as updates to reflect current business practices. Darren Ing, executive director of the Self Storage Association, explained the bill would confirm that rental agreements may be delivered and accepted electronically, provide a mechanism for unsigned agreements to take effect if tenants continue using the unit after a notification period, and streamline termination and disposition procedures for nonmonetary defaults (for example, illicit activity) without upsetting the statute’s existing nonpayment procedures.

Witnesses said the bill is not intended to change protections for tenants who default on rent; under current Michigan law an owner/operator may recover up to four months’ rent through lien-sale procedures and any proceeds beyond that must be returned to the unit owner. The bill’s proponents said the changes are intended to give owners and operators certainty when converting contracts after a facility sale or when updating agreements to comply with new law.

Committee members asked about notice periods and enforcement with local authorities in cases involving illicit activity; proponents said existing local enforcement and court processes remain available and that the bill clarifies operator remedies outside of nonpayment cases.

Ending: The committee took testimony; no committee vote was recorded on the bill during this session.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Michigan articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI