Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Stormwater Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board OKs code change to allow limited sump‑pump discharges, adds 10‑foot dissipation requirement
Summary
The village board approved an ordinance amending section 15.08 of the Germantown Municipal Code to allow some clearwater discharges (including front‑yard and roadside ditch outlets) under specified conditions and to clarify enforcement language; trustees cited safety and long‑term pavement damage as drivers for the change.
The Germantown Village Board unanimously approved an ordinance amending municipal code section 15.08 to permit certain clearwater discharges — including from sump pumps and artesian wells — to the front of properties or to roadside ditches under defined conditions and to tighten enforcement language.
A staff presenter, Matthew, told the board the current code effectively made many existing sump‑pump discharges technically noncompliant because it prohibited discharge to the front of a property and to roadside ditches. The proposed amendment permits such discharges when they meet specified criteria, and it removes ambiguous uses of the defined term “nuisance” so the code’s enforcement language cannot be misapplied.
Matthew said the change also addresses safety and infrastructure concerns in a Wagon Trail subdivision, where several homes historically routed clearwater directly into the gutter. The new language requires that over‑the‑ground discharges dissipate before reaching the public right‑of‑way — generally by stopping 10 feet short of the property line or right‑of‑way — or that properties connect to a storm sewer lateral where available. The code will continue to prohibit discharging clear water into sanitary sewers.
Trustee Bob Warren said icing and pavement damage from continuous winter discharge are key concerns; he also asked how enforcement would work. Matthew pointed to the ordinance’s penalty and notice provision, which directs a written notice and a reasonable period to comply, with further penalties available under section 25.04 of the municipal code.
The motion to adopt the ordinance was made and seconded on the floor; the board approved the amendment by voice vote.
Board members emphasized that the amendment is intended to allow practical, code‑compliant solutions for existing homes without requiring major modifications while protecting public safety and pavement life. Staff said they will work with homeowners to identify the property/right‑of‑way line as part of compliance visits and that public works would continue to help prioritize problem areas.
Trustees did not discuss fee changes or retroactive enforcement beyond the standard notice‑and‑cure process described in the ordinance.
