Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Administration topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee considers formal revocation process and stricter zoning‑sign posting for special‑use hearings

5957919 · October 2, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee discussed adding ordinance language to allow staff to initiate special‑use revocation proceedings, and to require more durable applicant‑posted zoning signs (metal signs) with a deposit or fee; staff said the county may purchase metal signs for office use.

LaSalle County staff proposed ordinance changes to strengthen the county’s ability to enforce special‑use conditions and to improve public notice signage for zoning hearings.

Revocation process: Staff presented draft language allowing the department to initiate a special‑use revocation process when conditions are violated. Brian said revocations would be completed by ordinance: "The special uses are granted through ordinance in the first place. Yep. So you have to have an ordinance to revoke. Okay. You can't revoke an ordinance with a resolution," he said. Committee members supported adding clear revocation procedures to give the department enforcement tools before pursuing county‑board action.

Zoning signage: Staff asked whether applicants should be responsible for posting durable metal zoning signs and whether the county should require a deposit. The committee discussed options including applicant pickup of signs from the county office with a deposit and conspicuous posting requirements (for example, within a set distance of the road). Brian said signs currently blow away and that the county will look into metal signs. "I'll probably just I mean, we have some office supply budget. I'll probably just buy some signs anyway," he said.

Vacant building registration: Committee members noted the City of Ottawa has adopted a vacant‑property registration ordinance and discussed whether a countywide registration would be feasible; staff said enforcement countywide would be challenging without administrative adjudication and that the county’s current vacant‑property ordinance relies on civil processes.

Next steps: Staff will prepare ordinance language for revocation and for requiring or enabling more durable, applicant‑posted zoning signs and return with proposed fee/deposit language for committee consideration.