Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Workforce topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Councils press EEC on credentialing, salary scale and background checks; agency outlines next steps
Summary
During the joint meeting stakeholders pressed EEC on how a proposed credential and salary scale will intersect with OST, public schools and large employers, and raised concerns about Background Record Check (BRC) timelines; EEC said it is developing a salary model and improving BRC processes but offered no firm timelines.
Council members used EEC’s strategic planning discussion to press agency staff for specifics on workforce-related operational matters including credentialing, a state salary scale, and background record checks (BRCs).
EEC staff said they have been developing an educator credential aligned to competency domains and are working with partners (including AIR on salary‑scale modeling) to create a draft salary‑scale tool responsive to statutory language that asks EEC to propose pay commensurate with public‑school salaries. Agency staff noted the next stage is to consider how wage‑support mechanisms such as C3 might help programs move toward any future benchmarks.
Stakeholder concerns and agency response
- Salary scale and large employers: Several providers, including large multiservice organizations, warned a single EEC pay scale could clash with internal pay structures for non‑EEC activities (livguards, fitness staff). EEC acknowledged these concerns and said the salary tool is a draft required by statute and will be considered alongside program and employer differences. - Out‑of‑school‑time (OST) specificity: Providers asked whether OST licensing regulations will be revised separately from group/school‑age rules. EEC said OST licensing is in the queue for multi‑year regulation revision and that the agency intends to tailor rules to OST program realities, but that regulatory timelines are inevitably multi‑year. - Background Record Checks (BRCs): Programs and candidates sought clearer processing timelines and better candidate support. Steve (participant) asked for “reasonable expectations” for turnaround; agency staff said modernization and additional staffing have sped some checks (cases with no records can clear within 24 hours) but acknowledged complexity across systems (federal rules and other agencies) and said EEC will continue to build capacity and consider service-level targets.
Why it matters: Workforce credentialing, compensation and background checks are operational front doors to staffing and retention. The council emphasized that the agency should provide measurable timelines and clearer supports to reduce hiring friction.
Ending: EEC said it will continue to build the credential and salary‑scale tools, work with partners on OST regulatory revisions, and pursue BRC process improvements; staff offered to follow up with providers for more detailed technical conversations.
