Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Council defers contested AT&T wireless-communications variance to Dec. 4 after public opposition

October 16, 2025 | San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Council defers contested AT&T wireless-communications variance to Dec. 4 after public opposition
A request for a reduced separation to site a wireless-communications facility near Pruet Avenue in Council District 5 drew public opposition and was postponed to Dec. 4 by the San Antonio City Council on Aug. 16.

Jack Finger, a public commenter, urged the council to deny the request and described the proposed tower as a “monstrosity” that would intrude into a residential area. Finger also argued the facility did not meet customary separation standards and said the applicant’s proposed distance was insufficient.

Leon Jackford, who identified himself as the property owner, said the parcel is surrounded by commercial uses and noted family history with the site. Ben Simmon, representing AT&T, told the council the company had consulted with the neighborhood association, offered a setback of roughly 196.5 feet, and presented coverage maps the company says show gaps where improved service would enhance public safety and 911 reliability. Simmon said AT&T’s proposal would host multiple carriers on the structure to improve coverage.

A city staff summary included in the agenda packet recommended denial, according to the staff note read into the record; the transcript did not include a staff speaker stating the recommendation on the record. After public comment and applicant remarks, Councilmember Castillo moved to postpone the item to Dec. 4 so the council and staff could gather additional information and conduct further outreach; the motion passed.

The council did not record a roll-call vote count in the provided transcript excerpt. The record shows the applicant and owner said they believe the site is appropriate based on surrounding land uses and coverage needs; opponents raised concerns about visual impact and proximity to residences. The council’s postponement requires staff and the applicant to prepare materials and outreach for the Dec. 4 hearing.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Texas articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI