Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Accessory Dwelling Unit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves conditional-use permit for accessory building with ADU on Dirk Rockhill property
Summary
The commission approved a conditional-use permit for an approximately 4,500-square-foot accessory building that includes a 960-square-foot accessory dwelling unit (ADU); staff and commissioners discussed ADU sale/separation restrictions and construction details.
Get email alerts on the Accessory Dwelling Unit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Eastern Summit County Planning Commission approved a conditional-use permit for an accessory building with an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) on a 1.7-acre parcel in the AG-10 zone.
Planner Mustafa Osman presented the application on behalf of staff. Mustafa said the proposal is for an approximately 4,500-square-foot accessory building that would include a 960-square-foot ADU; the parcel already contains a primary residence and an existing garage. The site plan shows setbacks in compliance with the AG-10 zone and elevation and floor plans were included in the exhibits.
Mustafa noted staff’s recommended conditions of approval, including that the project be built according to the submitted exhibits and that the ADU “may not be sold separately from the single detached dwelling” — a condition drawn from the Eastern Summit County development code language on ADUs. Commissioners asked how that restriction is enforced; Mustafa cited the code (accessory dwelling unit language, e.g., 11-6-5) and staff explained that the ADU is tied to the same parcel as the primary dwelling and cannot be sold as a separate parcel without a formal subdivision process.
Commissioners also asked about a required stabilized construction entrance. Staff said construction-entrance details are required with building-permit submittals and the engineering department will require the parcel to show the location of the stabilized entrance on the permit site plan. The public hearing drew no public comment.
A motion to approve the Peterson Accessory Building CUP according to the findings of fact, conclusions of law and conditions of approval passed on a roll call voice vote; commissioners welcomed Mustafa, the new planner, and thanked applicants for attending.
Clarifying details included the accessory building size (about 4,500 sq. ft.), the ADU size (960 sq. ft.), the parcel size (about 1.7 acres), and references to the county’s ADU code (recorded condition advising that ADU “may not be sold separately”). Staff also noted site-design items (stabilized construction entrance) that must be called out before a building permit will be issued.
