Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission forwards positive recommendation on Promontory Hawkes Pass final plat
Summary
The commission recommended approval of a final subdivision plat for Promontory Hawkes Pass, allocating estate and resort density from Promontory's existing pool and identifying necessary code note corrections prior to county manager review.
The Eastern Summit County Planning Commission voted to forward a positive recommendation to the county manager on the proposed final subdivision plat for Promontory Hawkes Pass.
Planner Amir presented the plat, saying the applicants request allocation of eight units of estate density and seven units of resort density and the creation of one open-space parcel. Amir ran through a slope analysis, noting limited sensitive lands and identifying minor recordation notes from the recorder’s office that must be addressed prior to manager review. He also said building pads will be shown to comply with recent code amendments.
Applicants Sean Potter and Morgan Reesworth were present and confirmed they would add or correct the notes Amir identified — including showing building envelopes and clarifying golf-related easements missed on the engineer’s note set — before final recordation. Sean told the commission the applicants will modify the notes and building envelopes in compliance with the code.
Commissioners asked clarifying questions about which notes would be modified; staff explained a missed 75% building-envelope notation tied to a recent development agreement amendment, public-utility easements and golf-related easements. The public hearing drew no public comment.
A commissioner moved that the commission forward a positive recommendation to the Summit County manager to approve the final subdivision plat according to staff findings, conclusions of law and conditions of approval. The motion was seconded and carried by voice vote; the commission directed staff and the applicant to resolve the recordation items before manager-level processing.
Clarifying details recorded during the hearing included the allocation of 8 estate-density units and 7 resort-density units, one open-space parcel, the need to show building envelopes, and a 75% building-envelope requirement intended to reduce disturbance tied to a soil repository. The applicant stated they expect to provide required revisions before the county manager’s review.
