Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Sale Restriction topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Socorro ISD trustees approve 30-year deed restriction to limit K-12 use if district properties are sold
Summary
The Socorro Independent School District board approved a resolution to include a deed restriction in any future sale of five district-owned properties that would bar use for K–12 education by entities other than the district for 30 years.
The Socorro Independent School District Board of Trustees on Oct. 15 approved a resolution that would place a 30-year deed and use restriction on any of five district-owned properties if those properties are sold.
The restriction would bar a purchaser or subsequent owner from using the property for K–12 educational purposes except by Socorro ISD or an entity affiliated with the district. The district’s administration said the restriction is intended to protect the district’s fiscal health and long-range facility planning.
Board attorney or district representative Blanco told trustees that the restriction would "run with the land as part of the deed, and it would last for a period of 30 years," and that the stated reasons include protecting public investment and preserving the district’s ability to manage enrollment and future facility needs. Blanco read a list of the five properties being considered for possible sale and said the restrictions would be included in the deed records if a sale is completed.
Trustees moved and seconded the resolution, and the measure passed on a voice vote. The motion to approve was made by Mister Smith and seconded by Mister Rodriguez, and the chairman called for the ayes and nays before declaring the item passed.
The board emphasized that offering the properties for sale does not guarantee a sale; the resolution applies only if a transaction is finalized and the deed is conveyed with the restriction. The district said the restriction would support planning and financing timelines school districts and charter operators typically use when planning facilities over multi-decade periods.
The properties named during the meeting were read by parcel/location identifiers on the public agenda; the administration did not at the meeting provide projected sale prices or specific prospective buyers. The board’s action was taken in open session after the trustees had discussed the matter in executive session under Texas Government Code related to real property and legal consultation.
Trustees did not provide a timetable for listing any property for sale or for further public engagement should an individual parcel move toward a transaction.
