Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Retrofit Complaint topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident says county retrofit installation failed; asks for county follow-up

5956594 · October 2, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A Longmont-area resident told commissioners that a county-promoted retrofit paid for or coordinated through local programs was not functioning after installation and that the project cost $55,000; the resident said she has been unable to get a satisfactory county response.

A resident told the Boulder County Board of County Commissioners on Oct. 2 that a county-promoted retrofit to her home is not functioning and that she has received no satisfactory remedy after more than a year.

The speaker, who identified herself during public comment as a county resident, said the retrofit—installed about a year earlier after a two-year application and waiting process—failed to provide adequate hot water and produced an intolerable buzzing electronic noise in her living spaces. She said a vendor previously declined to perform a solar installation because of adverse conditions, that the county subsequently changed vendors, and that the result was nonfunctional equipment she described as a $55,000 failure. “This is obnoxious. It’s unacceptable that the city that the county would lie,” she said during public comment.

The speaker said she had pursued a retrofit through the city of Boulder and then through county-backed programs and that she has been waiting for installation or repair for much of a two-year period. She asked the county to address the problem and to explain why she had not received working equipment or remedies.

Commissioners did not respond to the speaker with a specific remedy during the meeting; the comment was filed during the public-comment period. The transcript does not include staff follow-up details or a county action plan on the complaint.

Provenance: Complaint delivered during public comment beginning at 00:09:52 (speaker’s remarks) and ending at about 00:11:52 in that public-comment block.