Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rental Parking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee removes proposed short-term-rental amendment after reviewing state limits on residential parking
Summary
Proposed Amendment No. 5 (short-term rentals and parking limits) was removed from the committee’s package after members concluded state law limits municipal authority for residential parking rules and the town treats short-term rentals as nonresidential hospitality uses.
The committee removed proposed Amendment No. 5, which would have revised short-term-rental parking rules to match state language, after members concluded the change was not required for short-term rentals as the town treats those uses as hospitality rather than residential.
Jessica (staff) had proposed changing parking text from per-bedroom to per-unit to conform with SB 284’s summary language on residential parking. Committee members noted RSA language that limits municipal authority to require more than one residential parking space per dwelling unit, but they also observed RSA 674:16 (as quoted in the discussion) does not limit regulation of nonresidential uses. Jesse McArthur and others explained that because Alton treats short-term rentals as a hospitality/commercial use rather than a residential use, the state restriction on residential parking does not remove the town’s authority to regulate parking for short-term rentals.
A motion to strike Amendment No. 5 from the committee’s package was made and seconded; the committee voted and the motion passed. Chair Tom Diveny said the removal avoids an unnecessary change and preserves the town’s ability to regulate parking for short-term rentals as a nonresidential use.
Staff will remove Amendment No. 5 from the packet and update the draft amendment list accordingly.
