Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Human Resources topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Harney County discusses employee wellness suggestions: vacation payout options, payroll frequency and HR policy review
Summary
County staff presented employee suggestions from a workplace suggestion box on changing the timing of longevity pay, options to cash out accrued vacation, and moving payroll from monthly to twice-monthly. Commissioners asked staff to survey department heads and employees and to review potential fiscal impacts before any policy change.
Harney County Court discussed employee suggestions Oct. 15 that touched on three personnel policy topics: timing of length-of-service (longevity) payments, the option to cash out accrued vacation hours, and changing payroll frequency from monthly to twice-monthly.
County staff summarized the current arrangements: longevity or length‑of‑service payments are paid monthly (amounts rise incrementally after an initial threshold); vacation accruals are subject to a maximum carryover and employees who reach the cap stop accruing additional vacation until they reduce their balance; and county payroll is processed monthly, a practice some employees find difficult for household budgeting.
Staff cautioned that allowing annual cash outs or changing carryover/payout rules could increase county liabilities and that policy design should avoid creating a new, larger long‑term payout obligation. "If everybody started cashing out, then yes, that would be a financial burden that we would have to consider," a county HR/finance official said.
On payroll frequency, staff said the county’s payroll process currently consumes significant HR time (two to three days per pay period) and that moving to twice‑monthly payroll without software or process improvements would increase workload. Upgrading the county’s financial/payroll software was discussed as a potential enabler but would carry implementation cost.
Commissioners directed staff to survey department heads and employees and to present findings at the next department‑heads meeting. Commissioners also said this is a suitable time to incorporate any changes into the county’s employee handbook revision process, which is underway.
No policy changes were made on Oct. 15; staff will return with cost estimates and employee feedback.
Votes at a glance: No vote; staff directed to gather employee and department‑head input and to analyze fiscal impacts.
