Board approves three change orders to close out high school project; two prime contracts remain open
October 17, 2025 | Abington SD, School Districts, Pennsylvania
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
The Abington Board of School Directors approved awards of contracts (addendum 8.1) at its Oct. 14 meeting to finalize three prime-contractor change orders that are part of the closeout of the Abington Senior High School project. Administration described the actions as negotiated settlements resolving outstanding contractor claims related to schedule extensions and related costs.
Administration asked Mr. Adani Hu to expand on the closeout work and told the board the settlements resolve claims with three prime contractors. Doctor Fetcher said the settlements avoided further litigation and the additional costs of retaining delay consultants and pursuing claims in court.
Board members asked for clarification about the reason for the increases. Administration said the increases tied to those contracts came mainly from time-related claims and extended services, and that some change orders reflected district-initiated direction to alter scope during the project. Administration noted the project occurred in the COVID period, which contributed to delays and claims.
The board confirmed two outstanding prime contracts remain: Burrow General Construction and Burrow Electric. A roll call vote approved the change orders; the motion passed with recorded ayes by board members present.
Public commenters pressed the board for more detail about costs and oversight. Joe Rooney asked how the district had negotiated construction management and questioned the difference between the $30 million fee for ICS on the current management team and prior management fees (he cited a $1.5 million prior award). Doctor Fetcher responded that the two are not comparable because ICS provides full-service architecture, engineering and construction management, whereas the prior amount covered only construction management and architects and engineers were separate line items.
Administration said the closeout settlements were intended to minimize further expense and uncertainty and that two remaining prime contracts will be addressed in future board actions as negotiations continue.
Administration asked Mr. Adani Hu to expand on the closeout work and told the board the settlements resolve claims with three prime contractors. Doctor Fetcher said the settlements avoided further litigation and the additional costs of retaining delay consultants and pursuing claims in court.
Board members asked for clarification about the reason for the increases. Administration said the increases tied to those contracts came mainly from time-related claims and extended services, and that some change orders reflected district-initiated direction to alter scope during the project. Administration noted the project occurred in the COVID period, which contributed to delays and claims.
The board confirmed two outstanding prime contracts remain: Burrow General Construction and Burrow Electric. A roll call vote approved the change orders; the motion passed with recorded ayes by board members present.
Public commenters pressed the board for more detail about costs and oversight. Joe Rooney asked how the district had negotiated construction management and questioned the difference between the $30 million fee for ICS on the current management team and prior management fees (he cited a $1.5 million prior award). Doctor Fetcher responded that the two are not comparable because ICS provides full-service architecture, engineering and construction management, whereas the prior amount covered only construction management and architects and engineers were separate line items.
Administration said the closeout settlements were intended to minimize further expense and uncertainty and that two remaining prime contracts will be addressed in future board actions as negotiations continue.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
View full meeting