Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Lubavitch Façade topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board asks Lubavitch to adjust material and facade treatment, continues request for longer staff review
Summary
The board heard a proposal to re-clad the Lubavitch Educational Center corner in a replica of the organization’s Brooklyn headquarters; members asked the applicant to work with staff on material choices and side-wall treatments and continued the application to allow revised options.
Get email alerts on the Lubavitch Façade topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Design Review Board heard a proposal Sept. 11 from Chabad/Lubavitch to replicate the façade of its Brooklyn headquarters on the corner of Alton Road and Flamingo Park but continued the item for the applicant to work with staff on materials and side-wall treatments.
Applicant presentation: The applicant presented a three-gabled brick façade treatment, ornate precast details around doors and windows, and a slate roofing option (applicant clarified selected roofing is slate rather than asphalt shingles). The design team said the façade is intended to match other Lubavitch locations and to create a recognizable headquarters presence for the organization in Miami Beach.
Board concerns and direction: Several board members said the proposed treatment — brick gables and carved precast ornament — will be visually prominent from Alton Road and suggested the design team explore ways to relate the façade to Miami Beach materials and context (lighter brick tones, partial side-wall application, or reduced vertical elements). Staff and board asked the applicant to return with façade material samples and options showing the same motif with less dominance on the side walls. The board did not vote on final design and continued the item to allow the applicant to work with staff and return with revised options, ideally including brick samples and without decorative rooftop finials if feasible.
Why it matters: The board flagged the tension between an applicant’s desire for a branded façade replicated from another city and the local urban context of Miami Beach; members recommended material changes and more integrated side-wall treatments rather than a literal transplant.
Provenance: The presentation begins with the applicant’s description of the Brooklyn façade and ends with the board motion to continue the item to allow staff-supported revisions.

