Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Collins Ave Retail topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Retail center façade, lighting and landscaping on Collins Avenue continued after board asks for stronger facade renderings
Summary
Design team for a Collins Avenue retail center presented updated landscape, lighting and drainage plans; the Design Review Board continued the item for more refined lighting/fixture details and proof of drainage remediation.
Get email alerts on the Collins Ave Retail topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Design Review Board continued consideration Sept. 11 of a proposed recladding and site renovation for an existing commercial shopping center on Collins Avenue after hearing a presentation on landscaping, lighting and evidence of drainage remediation.
Applicant representatives described a planting plan that adds drought-tolerant barrier plantings along Collins Avenue and cluster plantings (sable palms, bridal palms and others) to screen the parking lot. The submission included an irrigation plan and a photometric lighting plan: three pedestrian-scale 12-foot poles to light the lot, recessed soffit lighting to illuminate storefronts, and wall-mounted fixtures on the canopy. The architect also displayed receipts and vendor information to demonstrate a recent hydro-cleaning of on-site drains.
Board members praised the landscaping work but said the proposed wall-mounted fixtures and soffit lighting looked industrial and included mismatched color temperatures in the presentation; several members asked for more integrated fixture choices, color-temperature coordination and renderings of the building with the proposed fixtures in place. One member noted earlier DRB approval of the storefront design and clarified that the current hearing covers only the parking-lot, landscaping and lighting elements that were continued at the May 15 hearing. The applicant asked for a continuance to refine lighting details and provide a fuller rendering linking lighting, materials and the façade; the board granted that continuance and set a tentative return in November (applicant to coordinate final calendar with staff).
Why it matters: Board members said façade and lighting details significantly influence how a remodeled retail center will read from the street; they preferred integrated lighting fixtures and specifications that will not appear as afterthoughts on a renovated storefront.
Speakers at the hearing included the applicant’s architect (Shimon Simbowski), the applicant’s representative on site, and Design Review Board members Gabriel, Adam and others. Staff confirmed that drainage remediation evidence was submitted and that final building permits will require engineering-level stormwater plans and compliance with city lighting limits.
Provenance: Discussion begins with the staff update on May 15 continuation items and the applicant’s presentation; the board concluded to continue the item for further design coordination.

