Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Proceedings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Denham Springs council authorizes three public hearings, approves donation of surplus electronics
Summary
At its Sept. 22 meeting the Denham Springs City Council authorized public hearings on a rezoning request and gas tap fee changes, and approved donation of surplus police electronics. All motions passed as presented.
Get email alerts on the Council Proceedings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Denham Springs — At its Sept. 22 meeting the Denham Springs City Council approved several procedural items and a donation in short votes that generated little public debate.
Rezoning public hearing: The council authorized a public hearing for a proposed rezoning (RZ‑454) requested by Denham Springs Living LLC for a portion of Lot 9 A1 (Section 37, T7S R3E) along LA Highway 16. The hearing was set for Oct. 14, 2025, at 6 p.m. in the municipal courtroom. The motion was moved and seconded and passed; council recorded votes in favor by members identified in the meeting as DuBois, Gilbert, Sam Williams and Wesley; one member announced an abstention because they would not be present at the hearing.
Gas tap fee ordinance public hearings: The council authorized two public hearings to consider amendments to the City of Denham Springs Code of Ordinances, chapter 106, adding section 33 relative to gas tap fees (including a provision regarding residential tap fees inside city limits). Both hearings were scheduled for Oct. 27, 2025, at 6 p.m. in the municipal courtroom. Councilmembers moved and seconded the motions and the council recorded the motions as approved.
Donation of surplus electronics: The council approved donation of various electronic equipment and components from previously approved surplus (noted as approved surplus on June 10, 2025) — specifically items removed from units 471 and 572 — to the Greensburg Police Department. The motion passed on a voice vote.
Each of these items was listed on the meeting agenda as procedural steps to set public hearings or to dispose of surplus property; the council did not add substantive amendments to the proposed texts during this session.
