Board agrees in concept to fund treasurer’s chief deputy collector position from existing county board lines

5965688 · September 30, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members agreed to a proposal to fund a new chief deputy collector position (salary and benefits: $92,356) largely by reallocating county board administrative funds and small offsets from other county board lines; the treasurer offered a partial contribution and the board gave informal approval to include the position in the FY26 budget.

The county board discussed a formal proposal to fund a chief deputy collector position in the treasurer’s office. The position’s total cost was presented as $92,356 (salary plus benefits). The treasurer offered to contribute $6,520 from the treasurer’s budget; the remainder would be paid largely from county board lines.

Finance staff outlined a funding package: $63,039 from an unused administrator salary line in the county board budget, $15,000 from professional services, $3,000 from advertising/legal notices, $1,000 from conferences and training, and $3,797 from dues/licenses/memberships. The proposal, presented in the meeting packet, was described as leaving the overall general fund budget flat.

Board members who participated voiced support for maintaining a functioning treasurer’s office. "I can't think of a higher priority ... than to make sure that our financial ship is in order," said Miss Portado. The board gave an informal thumbs‑up to the funding plan; staff said the allocation covers salary and benefits. The treasurer attended the meeting to answer questions.

Why it matters: The board characterized the position as critical to stability in the treasurer’s office and to continuity of financial operations. Members described the recommended funding as a reallocation of existing board administrative funds rather than an added general fund cost.

Next steps: Staff will record the proposed reallocations into the FY26 budget documents for the board’s formal vote during the upcoming budget adoption process.