Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents raise election‑integrity concerns and local service notices during public comment at Kankakee County meeting

5965923 · October 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Public comment at the Oct. 14 Kankakee County Board meeting included a veterans dental‑care notice, questions about local solar‑farm policy, contractor payment complaints tied to a private firm, a resident’s allegations about a former board appointment, and an extended presentation by volunteers with Unite for Freedom urging a county resolution on

Public comment at the Kankakee County Board’s Oct. 14 meeting covered several distinct citizen concerns, including an informational item for veterans, questions about solar‑farm development, unpaid‑contractor allegations tied to a private company, a resident’s allegation regarding a former board appointment, and a lengthy presentation urging the board to adopt a resolution about election integrity.

James Wazier, who identified himself as handling publicity for a local veterans dental day, told the board a free veterans dental event will be held Nov. 7 from 9 a.m. to noon and that veterans can receive cleanings, extractions or fillings without appointments; if the event reaches capacity, attendees will receive a voucher for a later appointment. Wazier asked the board to help get the information to constituents.

Wazier also asked whether the county has a moratorium or acreage limits for solar farms. He asked the board to advise him on that question; board staff indicated they would follow up.

A resident who identified himself as a retired union electrician raised concerns about a private company he called "Negotiate Industries," saying two contractors told him they had been paid months late or owed large sums. He asked the board to check whether contractors were being paid on time. The board did not take action on that request during the meeting; it was recorded as public comment.

Robert S. Ellington Snipes used public comment to dispute remarks attributed to him at a prior meeting and to raise allegations about the legality of a previous county appointment. Snipes said he has lived at the same address in Kankakee for more than 31 years and contended that Andrew Wheeler (also spelled in the record as Andrew Willie) did not meet 30‑day residency requirements at the time of a 2020 appointment; Snipes urged a refund of tax dollars if appointments were improperly made. The transcript records Snipes’s allegations but the board did not take immediate action on them; they remain assertions by a public commenter.

A group of volunteers associated with Unite for Freedom delivered an extended presentation that the speaker said was based on an independent audit of official election files. Brian Jones, who identified himself as a resident of Winnebago County and a volunteer with Unite for Freedom, summarized the group’s findings and requested that the board consider a resolution to “ensure a legally valid 2026 general election.” Jones cited federal statutes and court precedent in framing the group’s resolution language and listed proposed measures including infrastructure compliance, voter verification, ballot security, and ballot custody procedures. The presentation included numerical claims about registration errors and alleged “voting violations”; meeting staff cut the speaker off after the three‑minute public comment allotment, then the board voted to extend public comment before the presentation continued.

A second speaker associated with the same group, identified in the transcript as Babe Poxtus (Cook County resident), reiterated requests that the board support the volunteers’ work and suggested placing a formal presentation on a future agenda so the board could review underlying documents.

Board chair Alexander Hildebrand and county staff did not adopt the proposed resolution during the meeting. Staff indicated public‑comment follow‑up would be possible if the board places the matter on an agenda.

The public‑comment period also included a short question from Kathy Wagner (Joliet) and other brief remarks; the record shows the board extended the allotted time for public comment by motion and voice vote.

These items were recorded as public comment rather than formal board business. The board did not vote on the election‑integrity proposals during the Oct. 14 meeting; any future action would require placement on a committee or full‑board agenda.