Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Civil Service Personnel Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Las Vegas civil service trustees certify hiring lists and extend eligibility pools
Summary
The Board of Civil Service Trustees approved certification of multiple eligible lists, extended several eligibility lists (with one job removed), and certified a classification specification for lead court clerk at its Oct. 8 meeting; no public comment was taken.
Get email alerts on the Civil Service Personnel Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Board of Civil Service Trustees approved certification of several eligible hiring lists and extensions and certified a classification specification at its Oct. 8 meeting in Las Vegas.
The actions included certifying eligible lists for DPS communication specialist (open), HVAC technician (open), laboratory quality assurance officer (open), parking enforcement officer (open) and parking support technician (open) under agenda item 5. Member Hirsch moved to approve item 5 as read; the board recorded aye responses and carried the item.
Under agenda item 6 the board approved extensions of eligible lists for multiple classifications after removing one position from consideration. Deputy City Attorney Michelle Alaniz notified the board that a request had been received to strike Bridal Protection Services Officer 1 from item 6. Member Panachello moved to approve item 6 as amended; the motion carried on recorded voice votes with ayes and no opposition noted in the transcript.
The board also certified the classification specification for lead court clerk under agenda item 7 after a motion by Member Clemons; that item carried on a voice vote with ayes recorded. Earlier in the meeting the board approved by motion the final minutes of the Sept. 24, 2025 meeting.
Chair Brown called roll and confirmed a quorum with Vice Chair Ponicello, Member Clemons, Member Hesch present; Member Stamper was excused. The board stated it was in compliance with the open meeting law. There were no public comments during the portions of the agenda that allow public participation. The meeting then moved to citizen participation and was adjourned when no speakers came forward.
These actions update and preserve the pools of eligible candidates the city may use for hiring and promotion for the specified classifications; the board took the approvals by voice vote and did not record individual tallies in the transcript.

