Cedar Park council moves forward on contracts, grant support and transit pilot; votes at a glance

5829582 · September 25, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Cedar Park’s council approved multiple contracts and grant‑related agreements, including Toro Grande construction and engineering support for a federal ATTAIN grant, and authorized negotiations for a microtransit pilot.

The Cedar Park City Council approved a series of resolutions and agreements during its meeting, ranging from debt defeasance to a major roadway construction contract and authorization to negotiate a microtransit pilot partnership. Several items passed unanimously or by wide margins.

Votes at a glance (formal actions recorded at the meeting):

- Consent agenda: Approved (motion passed; recorded as 6–0 with one member absent). Items D and F were included; Council approved contingent language noted in the motion concerning items F3 and F4.

- Resolution authorizing defeasance and redemption of bonds (H1): Staff presented a plan to defease approximately $2,250,000 using the adopted debt service rate for FY2026. Council approved the resolution (vote recorded: unanimous among those present; 6–0, one absent). Staff advised the defeasance program has saved $21.6M of principal and about $7M in interest through FY2024 and that the upcoming action continues the program.

- Authorization to negotiate with Tripp Consulting for a transportation network company (TNC)-based microtransit pilot (H3): Staff recommended Tripp Consulting, which proposes to leverage Uber for standard rides and Z Trip for wheelchair‑accessible trips, and to provide monthly ridership data for performance monitoring. Council authorized negotiations to finalize scope and pricing and the motion passed unanimously by those present.

- Toro Grande Boulevard roadway improvement project contract (H4): The council authorized the city manager to execute an agreement with Liberty Civil Construction LLC for the Toro Grande Boulevard roadway improvements in an amount not to exceed $25,197,028. The procurement followed a competitive sealed proposal process and the motion passed 6–0 with one member absent.

- Utility relocation reimbursement agreement with Atmos Energy (H5): Council approved a reimbursement agreement not to exceed $1,588,678 to relocate two high‑pressure gas lines to support the Toro Grande roadway project. Staff said Atmos had negotiated separate private easements and the reimbursement is within budget; council approved the resolution 6–0 with one absence.

- Professional engineering services for ATTAIN grant support (H6): The council approved selection of Iteris to provide federal grant and engineering support in an amount not to exceed $977,195. The ATTAIN grant is a U.S. Department of Transportation/FHWA award of approximately $4.424 million to the city; Iteris’ contract will be funded by the grant. Motion passed unanimously among those present.

- Rezoning 1401 North Lakeline (H2): Council approved rezoning on second reading (approx. 2.94 acres) after debate; vote 5–4 with one absent. (This item was discussed separately in the meeting and is covered in a dedicated article.)

- Williamson Central Appraisal District nominations (H7): Council nominated two candidates for the WCAD board — motion recorded to nominate John Watson and Lisa Berkman for the upcoming terms. Ballot and resolution timing was explained; the motion passed by voice vote of those in attendance.

- Travis Central Appraisal District nominations (H8): Council took no action and made no nominations for TCAD.

- CAPCOG letter of support for a Regional Energy Management proposal (H9): Council approved a letter of support for CAPCOG’s application to the Texas State Energy Conservation Office; motion passed unanimously among those present.

Several other routine items and first‑reading public hearings were heard (for example: first readings of strength-of-force ordinance for police and fire staffing). Where votes were recorded the clerk’s tally is included above; staff will post ordinance texts, contract amounts and recorded vote details in the official minutes.

Council did not take additional budget actions at the meeting beyond the items above; several votes authorize staff and consultants to proceed with negotiated agreements, site plans or grant‑funded work.