Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Police chiefs and first‑responder groups back ‘Halo Act’ to create 25‑foot safety zone at emergency scenes

September 23, 2025 | 2025 Legislature MA, Massachusetts


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Police chiefs and first‑responder groups back ‘Halo Act’ to create 25‑foot safety zone at emergency scenes
Boston — Police chiefs, labor representatives and public safety trainers told the Joint Committee on the Judiciary on Sept. 21 they support H.2057, known as the “Halo Act,” which would create a 25‑foot safety zone around first responders engaged in emergency operations and authorize limited misdemeanor charges if a warned person refuses to back away.

Steven Xiarhos (state representative and former deputy police chief), Chief David Fowler (Salisbury Police Department), the Massachusetts Chiefs of Police Association and labor groups described the bill as a reasonable, narrowly targeted tool to protect responders and the people they are helping during urgent incidents. Chief Fowler said the bill “establishes a 25 foot safety zone around first responders actively engaged in emergency operations” and “requires a verbal warning before any arrest is made.”

Union representatives and training coordinators said the statute would support modern de‑escalation tactics by creating space. A state use‑of‑force coordinator described revised training that emphasizes force mitigation and distance; advocates for the bill said it would not prohibit lawful observation or recording at a safe distance. The proposed penalty scale mentioned a fine for a first offense with strengthened penalties for repeat conduct.

Committee members asked about First Amendment concerns and how the statute would define “official duties” and intent; sponsors and labor witnesses said the bill contains an intent requirement and that it is intended for hostile or obstructive conduct interfering with emergency work, not peaceful observation. No committee votes occurred at the hearing; bill backers urged a favorable report.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Massachusetts articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI