Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
McHenry County planning committee advances 2050 comprehensive plan with minor edits to address unincorporated needs
Summary
The Planning, Environment and Development Committee voted to forward a resolution adopting the McHenry County 2050 comprehensive plan to the full county board after discussion about annexation examples, walkable-neighborhood language and gravel-aquifer conflicts.
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The McHenry County Planning, Environment and Development Committee voted Oct. 7 to forward a resolution adopting the McHenry County 2050 comprehensive plan to the full county board after members raised targeted edits and clarifications.
Committee member Joe (name on record, committee member) said the plan is “a long time coming” but “not perfect,” and urged edits to keep the document focused on unincorporated county areas rather than municipal models. He singled out language that uses Hillside Road and Crystal Lake as an example of potential annexation impacts and warned that county-developed single-family areas can act as barriers to municipal expansion.
The discussion focused on several chapters and map keys that members said should be clarified before final county-board action. Committee members flagged the plan’s use of city-style concepts such as “walkable” or “15-minute neighborhoods,” saying those goals do not reflect development patterns in unincorporated McHenry County. Another area of concern was the plan’s treatment of aggregate (gravel) resources and groundwater: members said the plan should acknowledge a fundamental trade-off between gravel extraction and availability of drinking water and recommend that the plan explicitly note competing interests.
Members also identified specific editorial and mapping fixes: a legend inconsistency on the aquifer map was noted, and members asked that references to local transit station planning be made less prescriptive where municipal participation has changed. One member asked that mention of the Hackmatack regional conservation project be retained and given appropriate prominence as a long-term open-space resource.
Committee staff said the document reflects revisions requested by the committee and state and federal reviewers and that most concerns could be addressed with targeted redlines. Chairman Mueller (chairman) said staff would bring page-referenced edits to the committee’s representative at the Committee-of-the-Whole meeting so additional comments can be incorporated before final county-board consideration.
The committee voted to advance the resolution to the full county board; members said typographical errors and clarifying language could be corrected through a redline process. The county board will consider the plan in a future meeting and may adopt it after any final edits are incorporated.

