At an unnamed meeting, participants proposed a motion to enter an executive session to "discuss numbers," but the transcript does not record a vote or formal outcome. Speaker 2, an unidentified meeting participant, said, "motion to go in to Exeative secial і grama." Speaker 1, an unidentified meeting participant, also remarked in Ukrainian, "регламент того можу бути."

The comments in the record consist of short procedural remarks and a reading of a motion; no motion maker, second, or vote tally is included in the transcript. The transcript also includes an earlier utterance that appears to be partly garbled: "Repter дисплеy, тоді він лайк тут, розет. Продовжуємо. Продовжуємо відео roatching onine and thegociaations in til disttucumment as complictly encied bot parties and negosiations continued. Exakitive secition to discus numbers, а ви можете не азк вест Quest questions де де." This appears to reference continuing video and an executive session topic but does not provide additional procedural details.

Because the transcript contains only the motion language and no recorded action, this item remains a procedural proposal in the meeting record rather than a documented formal decision. The record does not specify who moved or seconded the motion, whether the body voted, or whether any direction to staff followed. No statutory citation, ordinance, or agenda item number is recorded in the transcript.

Future minutes or a fuller transcript may show whether the body actually entered an executive session and any formal vote; that information is not present in the provided record.