Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Instructional Supports topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cumberland Schools unveil tiered school success plan; board raises concerns about rollout and 'IE' intervention block
Summary
District leaders presented a tiered instructional support plan that pairs schools with cross‑department district teams, monthly vertical data talks, Cognia’s Elliott walkthrough tool, and a daily intervention/enrichment block; board members praised the focus on alignment but raised implementation, training and consistency concerns.
Cumberland County Schools’ new academic leadership presented a district‑wide school success plan intended to give targeted academic support to schools using a tiered model of foundational, strategic and intensive assistance.
Dr. Williams Leathers, the district’s new academic officer, said the plan aims to move “beyond a one‑size‑fits‑all model” by aligning central office teams with school instructional leadership teams so support is diagnostic, data‑driven and sustained. The plan embeds Cognia accreditation characteristics and uses Cognia’s Elliott walkthrough tool to ground observations in student‑centered look‑fors, Dr. Leathers said.
Core components: District staff described several structures to support schools: monthly vertical team instructional data talks grouped by attendance area; monthly instructional leadership team professional learning; a common data‑analysis protocol that emphasizes action planning and accountability; district Elliott walkthroughs; and a cross‑department district support team that can provide subject specialists, EC (exceptional children) support, data analysts, and other services tailored to a school’s tier.
Intervention and Enrichment (IE) block and concerns: Staff also described a daily 60‑minute Intervention and Enrichment (IE) block intended to protect core instruction while providing targeted intervention, English learner (EL), exceptional children (EC) and AIG services. The proposal asks schools to schedule a common block so students are not pulled from core lessons at random and so interventions can be targeted.
Several board members said the IE block and other features are not yet implemented consistently across schools. Board members raised operational concerns: principals and teachers reported uneven training, confusion over which staff should deliver interventions, and inconsistent materials or protocols used in the block. District staff acknowledged uneven rollout and described next steps including additional training for principals and coaches and a plan to share a “standard treatment protocol” and intervention resources.
Timeline and accountability: Staff said the vertical team data talks will begin in October (the first meeting noted for Oct. 2), with monthly follow‑up and school visits that could be weekly for intensive‑support schools. The district reiterated that school improvement plans are required by state statute and said the goal is to bring low‑performing school plans to the board in October and complete school improvement plan work by the statutory December deadline.
Board reaction: Board members commended the focus on alignment, but several urged the district to strengthen communication, provide clear protocols and ensure principals and teachers receive timely, practical training. One board member warned that multiple visitors and walkthroughs can disrupt student learning if not carefully coordinated. District leaders said they would provide the Elliott protocol and the standard treatment protocol to board members and principals and would monitor implementation and usage going forward.
Next steps: The district will roll out targeted professional learning and central‑office coaching, supply principals with a folder of data tools for monthly vertical meetings, and monitor school‑level implementation. School‑by‑school tweaks and principal feedback sessions are planned before the district intensifies weekly visits to tier‑3 schools.
