Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Fences topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City planner seeks uniform fence and accessory-building rules; council held public hearings
Summary
City staff proposed multiple text amendments to Moraines codified ordinances to clarify fence permits and heights, ban spiral barbed wire, permit battery-charged fences in specified districts under state law, and add corner-lot provisions; council opened and closed public hearings and asked staff clarifying questions.
City staff presented a package of text amendments to Moraines zoning code intended to clarify fence standards and accessory-building requirements in residential, agricultural, business and industrial districts. Council opened and later closed three related public hearings (TA-02-2025, TA-03-2025 and TA-04-2025) that would add permit requirements, limit certain fencing types in specified districts and add rules for corner and double-frontage lots.
Why it matters: The proposed language standardizes fence permitting and heights, addresses safety and sight-line concerns at intersections, and brings the citys ordinances into closer alignment with recent state law regarding electrically charged fencing.
What staff proposed: City Planner Nick Sarris told council the Ohio Building Code requires a building permit for any fence taller than 6 feet and said that requirement is being added to the Moraine Codified Ordinances. The amendments would: prohibit spiral barbed wire citywide; permit up to three-strand barbed wire in industrial districts; allow battery-charged (electrified) fencing in nonresidential and agricultural districts if a zoning permit is issued and the installation complies with Ohio Revised Code Section 378.1011; and add explicit setback and alignment rules for corner, double-frontage and reverse-corner lots so fences do not impair sight lines. In business and industrial districts staff proposed maximum heights of 6 feet for side and rear yards and 4 feet for front yards, with engineering review and community-development approval required for industrial fencing designs.
Questions and clarifications: Council members asked whether the proposed battery-charged fencing language would affect underground pet-fence systems. Sarris said it would not: "It does not, no," referring specifically to consumer underground dog-containment systems. Staff also explained that businesses with existing barbed-wire fencing that need like-for-like repairs after damage would be allowed to replace the fencing without a variance, provided the repair restores the existing condition.
Scope and next steps: The changes were taken through public hearings and are intended to return as formal legislation for council consideration. Staff noted that a revised Ohio Revised Code citation will be used in final legislation (the staff presentation noted an upcoming state update to the statute number). No final ordinance votes were taken at the hearing; council closed the hearings and staff said final language will be included in forthcoming legislation.
