Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Recycling Facility Siting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Washington County Planning Board tables Vaughn Recycling permit after large public outcry
Summary
The planning board deferred a decision on Vaughn Recycling’s high‑intensity conditional use permit after residents raised concerns about traffic, water, noise and environmental impact; the item will return to the board next month.
At its Sept. 25 meeting, the Washington County Planning Board voted to table a request from Vaughn Recycling for a high‑intensity conditional use permit (CUP) after more than two dozen residents and nearby property owners raised safety, environmental and traffic concerns.
The company, represented by Braden Wise of Bates & Associates and owner Leo (Levi) Vaughn, proposed relocating a full‑service metal recycling operation to a 6.52‑acre portion of a 13.26‑acre parcel east of Highway 412. Planning staff reported 202 notices mailed and 28 complaints citing incompatibility, potential health and environmental issues; seven comments supported the project on economic and recycling grounds.
Why this matters: Nearby residents told the board they are worried about heavy‑truck traffic on U.S. 412, runoff and groundwater contamination near private wells and Bob Kidd Lake, noise, decreased property values and emergency access. Multiple speakers said the site is close to schools, churches and existing residential neighborhoods.
What was presented: Vaughn representatives said the business would accept ferrous and non‑ferrous metals, store loose steel in contained concrete bays, and ship processed metal to regional buyers. Leo Vaughn said the company recycled nearly 22 million pounds of metal in 2024 and paid out about $5 million to suppliers; he said the facility would not accept trash, hazardous waste or operate a shredder on site.
Residents described several concerns during public comment: Bonnie Katon asked for a traffic study and cadmium testing; Louise Lecone said the site is only 80 feet from a house and called the proposed operation unsafe for single‑family areas; others raised flooding and stormwater runoff worries and said they had not been notified or adequately informed.
Planning staff and the applicant said technical reviews would come with the large‑scale development phase if a CUP is approved. Staff noted the CUP would trigger a separate large‑scale engineering review that would require stormwater, dust abatement and highway access permits, and that state agencies (ADEQ, Arkansas Department of Transportation) would review environmental and driveway issues.
Board action: After public comment, a board member moved to table the application so staff and the applicant could consider the concerns. The motion passed.
What’s next: Staff said the application will be returned to the board next month with any additional materials the applicant provides and with any changes to conditions requested by neighbors or required by reviewing agencies.
Community context: Residents asked the board to consider the limited ability of the county to regulate Highway 412 traffic, the proximity of schools and private wells, and the history of other metal recycling operations in the region. Planning staff emphasized that many technical controls are addressed during the large‑scale review but acknowledged tabling would allow the applicant time to respond to local concerns.
Ending: The board did not vote on the permit itself; it postponed action to allow the company and staff to address the public’s questions and to gather additional studies and agency responses.
