Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Events Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council begins rewriting special‑events policy; staff to refine ordinance and seek public input
Summary
City public‑safety and public‑works staff presented a proposed special‑events policy and fee schedule to recover staff costs for large events; council asked staff to refine ordinance language, coordinate with Montpelier Live and event organizers, and schedule a public hearing once draft revisions are complete.
Montpelier public‑safety and public‑works staff briefed the council on a proposed special‑events policy and fee schedule intended to recover staffing and equipment costs for large city events. After discussion the council asked staff to revise ordinance language, consult event organizers and Montpelier Live and return with a refined draft for a public hearing.
Why staff proposed change: Deputy Public Works Director Zach Blodgett and Deputy Chief Kevin Moulton said the city’s staff time supporting events has grown — large events now consume 50–100 staff hours for planning and operations — and the city sometimes provides barricades, traffic control and overtime that are not currently recovered. "Events take a lot of staff resource time," Blodgett said, and staff recommended charging for larger or for‑profit events while allowing council discretion to waive or reduce fees for community events.
Council and public concerns: Councilors and event organizers stressed the importance of keeping Montpelier’s signature community events viable. Council members suggested codifying a clear threshold that triggers fees and ensuring Montpelier Live and recurrent organizers are part of the drafting process. Several councilors asked for a simple, upfront process so applicants see a cost estimate attached to permit materials and can adjust their plans. Staff agreed to provide a clear, step‑by‑step applicant guide and to invite event organizers to review the draft.
Next steps: The council did not take final action but directed staff to clean up ordinance language (removing inconsistent parade references and clarifying the policy–ordinance relationship), circulate revisions to Montpelier Live and frequent applicants, and schedule a public hearing after edits are complete. Staff will attach cost estimates to permit packets and continue tracking event‑related costs in a dedicated account code.
Ending: Councilors said they supported recovering demonstrable costs for large for‑profit events but want a transparent, predictable process that protects volunteer and community events; staff will return with a revised ordinance and policy for public review and hearing.
