Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Consent Agenda Tabled topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council tables consent item No. 11 for one cycle after Alderman Kelly requests more information

5967404 · September 25, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Alderman Kelly moved to table consent agenda item No. 11 for one cycle citing constituent questions; the council voted 7–3 to table the item. A resident later referenced item No. 11 as a resolution about the Total Wellness Center during public comment.

On Sept. 24 the Davenport City Council voted 7–3 to table consent agenda item No. 11 for one cycle after Alderman Kelly said he had received “a lot of calls, emails, and text messages” requesting clarification on the item.

Alderman Kelly moved to pull item No. 11 from the consent agenda and stated he wanted the matter delayed for one cycle so council members could answer constituent questions. Alderman Burkholder seconded the motion after the mover clarified the tabling was for one future meeting cycle rather than indefinitely.

City staff conducted a roll-call vote on the motion to table. The recorded votes on the motion to table were: Reinartz — yes; Gripp — no; Lynch — yes; Burkholder — yes; Newton — yes; Kelly — yes; Bridal — yes; Jovgen — no; McGinnis — no; Anne Tiden — yes. The clerk announced the result as seven yeses and three noes and declared item No. 11 tabled for one cycle.

During the public-comment segment later in the meeting, resident Susan Menon identified herself as being in the Seventh Ward and attempted to thank Alderman Kelly for tabling “this resolution regarding the Total Wellness Center.” The mayor interrupted to note that issues already discussed on the agenda are not to be addressed again during the “other business” portion of public comment; Menon’s remark therefore did not reopen council debate on the item at this meeting.

The meeting record does not include the full description of item No. 11 in the public sequence where the tabling motion occurred; the item title and supporting documents should be consulted in the council packet for details. Councilmembers said on the record they tabled the item to allow time to answer constituent questions and to consider clarifications before the next cycle.