Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Redistricting Attendance Area Adjustment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Superintendent proposes redistricting plan to relieve Bryant Woods; board schedules public hearings and work sessions
Summary
Howard County staff presented a proposed elementary attendance-area adjustment on Sept. 25 that would reassign roughly 253 students among nearby schools to relieve Bryant Woods Elementary; transportation, demographic and exemption impacts were discussed and board hearings were scheduled.
Get email alerts on the Redistricting Attendance Area Adjustment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Superintendent staff presented a proposed attendance-area adjustment plan to the Howard County Board of Education on Sept. 25 that would reassign about 253 elementary students among nearby schools to relieve sustained overcrowding at Bryant Woods Elementary School and rebalance utilization across adjacent schools.
The plan: Tim Rogers, manager of school planning, told the board the superintendent’s proposed plan would reassign roughly 253 elementary students. The proposal would send about 74 students in neighborhoods along Owen Brown Road from Bryant Woods to Clemens Crossing, about 16 students in the Columbia Town Center area from Bryant Woods to Running Brook, and move several other neighborhood polygons so Clemens Crossing would send 125 students from Clary’s Forest to Swansfield and Swansfield would send about 38 in the Hawthorne area to Clemens Crossing. Staff projected resulting utilization rates would place Bryant Woods between roughly 93%–100% over the next ten years and keep Clemens Crossing at or below about 95%.
Exemptions and timeline: staff recommended announcing exemptions early for rising fifth graders and for students with IEPs, 504 plans and active-duty military families so affected families can plan. The boundary process was initiated Feb. 13, and staff set public hearings for Oct. 19 and Nov. 6 and board work sessions on Oct. 9, Oct. 23 and Nov. 13, with a planned final vote on Nov. 20.
Transportation and costs: John Siddiqui, director of student transportation, said most route shifts could be absorbed by existing buses but the proposed reassignments create a tiering imbalance that likely requires one additional bus for the Swansfield tier at an estimated cost of about $100,000. If exemptions for fifth graders and students with IEPs and 504 plans are granted, staff projected a need for up to two general-education buses and two specialized buses, with a modeled exemption-related cost of roughly $470,000; a general-ed bus was estimated at $100,000 and a specialized bus at $135,000.
Equity and demographic impacts: staff and consultants warned the changes would alter school demographics. The proposal would increase Bryant Woods’ direct certification (a proxy for concentrated poverty) from about 46% to 52.6% in the modeling provided the board; Running Brook and other schools saw smaller shifts. Board members asked staff whether the plan would further concentrate poverty at schools already above county averages and whether any threshold exists to prevent that; staff said policy 60-10’s 14 considerations were balanced and that changes were measured against countywide averages rather than a single statutory threshold.
Data requests and follow-up: board members asked for polygon-level detail on which student households would move, grade-level breakdowns of the relatively small moves (for example the 16-student move to Running Brook), the bus-route polygons that cause tier imbalance, and a clearer community-accessible GIS viewer for proposed boundaries. Consultants from Cropper GIS and district staff said they will provide a GIS map and additional polygon-level data and meet one-on-one with board members for deeper modeling.
What was not decided: the board did not vote on the plan Sept. 25. The presentation begun the board’s formal phase of engagement; staff emphasized that modeling continues and that the plan could be modified after the scheduled public hearings and work sessions.
Ending: staff framed the proposal as an initial, community-informed compromise that seeks to relieve Bryant Woods while minimizing long bus rides and preserving community contiguity; the board will take public testimony and work through recommended alternatives before a final vote scheduled Nov. 20.
