Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Grants Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves consent resolutions: grant awards, victims‑rights grant and Phoenix intergovernmental sewer agreement
Summary
Council approved Resolutions R25‑93, R25‑94 and R25‑95, accepting multiple Proposition 2022 grant awards to city and local institutions, authorizing a victims‑rights grant for Glendale PD, and amending an intergovernmental agreement with Phoenix for treated sewer service.
The Glendale City Council on Sept. 23 approved consent resolutions 24 through 26, accepting several grant awards and authorizing an intergovernmental agreement with the city of Phoenix regarding treated sewer service.
Resolution R25‑93 accepts multiple Proposition 2022 grant awards, allocating funds to several local recipients as read into the record by staff. The awards cited in staff remarks included $20,000 to the Glendale Police Department for reusable LED flares, $54,633 to Glendale Community College for a grab-and-go program, $25,000 to Fighter Country Foundation for FCP top 3 programs, $75,000 to the Maricopa County Community College Foundation for a student emergency assistance fund, and $30,000 to Midwestern University for community dental assistance, with those funds provided from the Gila River Indian Community.
Resolution R25‑94 authorizes the city to enter into an agreement with the Arizona Attorney General’s Office and accept the Fiscal Year 2026 victims‑rights program award (AG No. 2026‑044) in an approximate amount of $64,300 on behalf of the Glendale Police Department.
Resolution R25‑95 authorizes an amended intergovernmental agreement with the city of Phoenix to amend and reinstate Phoenix Agreement No. 114154 / Glendale Agreement No. C‑5239 (as amended) relating to treated sewer service to an area located in Phoenix and to terminate Phoenix Agreement No. 114155 / Glendale Agreement No. C‑5238. Staff read the resolutions into the record and the council approved them on the consent resolutions motion; there were no public speakers on these items.
Staff indicated these items had been previously studied; the resolutions were adopted as part of the consent calendar with the recommended language read into the record.
