Council hears proposal to acquire private Ironwood water system; board buy‑in and assessment details must be resolved

5968958 · September 24, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff described an offer to accept a private water distribution system in the Ironwood area if the homeowners’ associations fund required upgrades; council asked staff to return with HOA representatives and more detail on assessment mechanics.

City staff updated the Bradenton City Council on Sept. 24 about a pending request from Ironwood property owners to have the city assume ownership of a private water distribution system. The city would accept the system only after the infrastructure is brought up to city standards, staff said, and the Ironwood homeowners’ associations would be responsible for paying assessment costs under a proposed special assessment approach.

Staff said the existing system was built privately in the 1970s and is aging. The city engaged engineering consultants to condition‑assess the distribution network and prepared an estimate of likely construction costs to improve the system to city standards. Staff told council the cost would be recovered through a special assessment on the affected properties; initial estimates discussed in the meeting suggested assessment charges in the range of roughly $500–$600 per year per property for 15–20 years depending on final costs and financing options.

Council members stressed the need for broad buy‑in from residents and HOAs before the city would commit. The city attorney and staff asked for direction on the threshold of owner approval council would want to proceed — e.g., whether a supermajority of HOAs or building owners should be required. Staff recommended bringing HOA presidents and the master association’s representatives to a future meeting so the council could hear directly from property owners.

No council vote was taken. Council members asked staff to return with more detailed cost breakdowns, a proposal for the assessment vote threshold, and confirmation on fire‑safety and permitting implications for multi‑building properties.