Magistrate finds fire-code violations at Cortland shopping center; orders compliance or fines

5838001 · September 24, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The magistrate found violations related to record-keeping, LP-tank signage and fire-alarm maintenance at 605 Cortland Boulevard (shopping center with Publix) and ordered two violations corrected within 30 days or face $50 per day per violation; a third alarm-related violation was continued to allow a qualified witness to testify.

Deltona’s special magistrate found a property owner at 605 Cortland Boulevard — a shopping center with Publix as anchor tenant — in violation of two fire-code requirements and continued a third pending additional evidence.

Why it matters: the magistrate ordered the owner to correct recordkeeping and signage issues and to repair noted alarm-system deficiencies; the city warned that failure to comply would result in fines of $50 per day per violation.

Fire safety inspector Lisa Nadeau presented the case (Fire-038-2025) and said the city observed several deficiencies during inspections beginning 03/26/2025 and in follow-ups. The city sought records showing current backflow inspection/maintenance for a Cortland Boulevard entrance (violation A), signage on the LP tank that states "No Smoking" (violation C), and repairs to fire-alarm deficiencies noted in a 12/03/2024 fire-alarm inspection report (violation E). Nadeau told the magistrate the city requested 30 days to comply or $50 per day per outstanding violation.

Assistant Fire Marshal Samuel Schaller explained the alarm-reporting process and said the industry standard is that a licensed alarm contractor documents deficiencies and signs reports; Nadeau provided the report the city had received, which listed battery deficiencies in the panel and monitoring box.

Magistrate Kristen Ike said she could not find a violation based solely on hearsay — that is, a report authored by the alarm contractor — unless the city presented a witness with firsthand knowledge or supplemental competent evidence. She continued violation E so the city could present direct testimony or other supporting evidence about the alarm-system deficiencies. For violations A (backflow inspection record) and C (LP-tank signage), the magistrate found the respondent in violation and ordered corrections by 4:00 p.m. on 10/24/2025 (30 days). If the respondent does not comply by that date, the magistrate ordered fines of $50 per day per violation (a combined $100 per day) to be imposed until compliance is verified.

Next steps: the owner must provide the backflow inspection/maintenance report and install LP-tank signage stating "No Smoking" by 04:00 p.m. on 10/24/2025 or face daily fines; the city will continue violation E to allow the fire-alarm contractor or a qualified witness to provide direct testimony about the reported deficiencies.