Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

Advisory board debates phrasing of diversity and inclusion question for candidate interviews

5843002 · September 23, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members discussed whether to reword the DEI question on adult and student interview forms to use plainer language; they agreed to workshop alternatives and to circulate suggested wording to the director for consolidation ahead of November interviews.

Members of the Library Advisory Board discussed question wording for candidate interviews, focusing on question five on both the adult and student application forms. Several members said the existing phrasing used ‘‘DEI’’ language that some applicants might find unfamiliar or off-putting; others said wording should still capture concepts of diversity, inclusion and respect. The group proposed alternative phrasings (examples included asking how a candidate would "encourage and advance a supportive environment" or how they would "advance an environment of belonging" in a group). The board did not adopt a final replacement at the meeting; members agreed to send suggested rewordings to Director Corey Bridal, who will collate the proposals and circulate them to the board for final wording before interviews. Board members also discussed whether to provide interview questions to candidates in advance. Because interviews occur in a public meeting, some members noted that giving the questions ahead of time reduces disadvantage for candidates who interview early; others said seeing a candidate's unrehearsed answers can be informative. The board agreed to provide the questions in advance to help reduce candidate anxiety and to ensure consistency across interviews. No formal change to the question set was adopted at this meeting; the board set a short timeline for collecting suggested wording and planned to finalize question language before November interviews.