Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Library Materials topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parent speaker urges CCISD to expand library review tools and create "library taxpayer partnership"
Summary
A community member told the board that reviewing thousands of library titles is impractical for parents and proposed a district-run 'library taxpayer partnership' with classification, upvoting, and classroom-library inclusion; the remarks were public comment only.
Get email alerts on the Library Materials topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Thomas Davis addressed trustees during public comment urging Clear Creek ISD to expand parental tools around library materials and proposing a “library taxpayer partnership.” Davis said the district's recent library acquisition list included "over 4,000 unique titles under consideration," and that the review period ended Sept. 18, 2025. "Needless to say, we all rely on trusted institutions to make that task unnecessary. But how trustworthy are those institutions?" he asked.
Davis referenced the American Library Association and its past president, Emily Drabinski, and characterized certain professional-library language as ideologically driven. He proposed features for the district's system, including a Quora-style upvote feature for students, teachers, parents, and taxpayers; classification by grade and other criteria; and inclusion of classroom libraries so classroom-specific titles could be visible to that class's parents.
The remarks were part of the public comment portion; there was no board response beyond the standard procedural reminder that matters requiring response would be addressed by the superintendent as appropriate.
Why it matters: library-materials selection and parental-access policies are recurring issues in many districts and can affect classroom and library inventories. Davis suggested a set of specific technical and classification tools for district consideration. These comments constituted public input only; the board did not take action during the meeting.

