Applicant asks for more time; council continues Park North multifamily case to date uncertain and directs return to P&Z

5843784 · September 23, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

An applicant for the Park North multifamily development requested a continuance; council granted the continuance to date uncertain and required the project return to the Planning and Zoning Board for further review.

The council granted a continuance Sept. 22 for zoning case 24-00708, known as the Park North multifamily development, at the applicant's request.

Councilmember Summers moved to continue items 9a and 9b to a date uncertain and to require that the project return to the Planning and Zoning Board for review; Councilmember Adams seconded the motion. The applicant's attorney, Chris Webb of Rose Law Group, confirmed the applicant requested the continuance to make changes in response to concerns raised at a June hearing and to pursue revisions that could gain broader council support.

The motion passed. Council did not approve the project at the meeting; the continuance requires the applicant to make revisions and return to Planning and Zoning for recommendations before the council hears the item again.

Why it matters: the continuance pauses a significant multifamily proposal and requires additional review by the Planning and Zoning Board so the council can consider revised plans and recommendations before a final decision.

Next steps: applicant to revise plans and return to Planning and Zoning; council will set a future hearing date after P&Z review.