Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Meeting Quorum Adjournment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Meeting adjourned for lack of quorum; draft plan review deferred to November

5834501 · September 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

An online meeting ended early after participants determined there was no quorum. Staff said they will try to reconvene in October and aim to adopt a draft plan at the November meeting; staff also noted issues with closed‑session links and participant contact information.

A meeting that convened online was adjourned after organizers determined they did not have a quorum, pausing review of a draft plan and setting a tentative schedule to reconvene in October with a goal of adopting the plan in November, a staff member said.

The absence of enough members to proceed stemmed from several participants not joining the session and at least one participant not receiving the closed‑session link. The staff member said they would ask Tyler to send a new link and planned outreach to reinvite a participant identified as Catherine, who had not received the invitation. "We don't have a quorum, so we're, we're gonna have to, regroup," the staff member said.

The pause means the committee did not take any formal votes or adopt policy. The staff member said they will attempt to reschedule an October meeting "maybe on a regular day," and that attending remotely could allow the present directors to work through materials so the group could consider adopting the plan at its November meeting. The staff member also expressed hope that interested parties would submit written comments in the interim: "Hopefully they'll send some written comments to, the LSC between now and then."

Meeting organizers also discussed problems with contact lists and email addresses during the call, noting out‑of‑date contact information and a missing closed‑session link for a participant. The staff member said they would follow up by email to participants and to a person named Joe to communicate next steps.

No votes were taken, and no formal motions were made during the session. The next steps cited were staff outreach to participants, rescheduling a reconvening (targeting October), and preparing to bring the draft plan back for consideration at the November meeting.