Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Incentives Cass County topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
EDIC reviews Cass County draft policy on incentives; asks for clarifications
Summary
Committee members reviewed a Cass County draft policy on tax incentives and primary-sector support, asked staff to obtain clarifications about multi-year incentives and the 50% math in tax-incentive language, and encouraged continued engagement with county commissioners.
Members of the Economic Development Investment Committee reviewed a draft policy circulated by Cass County that would clarify county participation in tax incentives and support for primary-sector businesses. Committee members did not adopt any positions at the meeting but asked staff to seek clarifications from county officials on several points.
The committee discussed language in the draft that recognizes municipalities can approve incentives up to five years, and a follow-up clause that reads, according to the draft, “tax incentive proposals not aligning with the categories listed above will not be granted for more than 50% of any time period.” Several members said that phrasing was unclear and asked staff to ask the county for specifics. “I see the confusion there because does that mean you get to be 50% exempt for the full time period or 90% exempt for 50% of the time period?” one participant said.
Committee members also discussed county willingness to support incentives for primary-sector businesses beyond five years. A meeting participant described a positive signal in the draft that the county may be more open to primary-sector projects with terms greater than five years, and asked staff to seek confirmation from the county about whether that openness applies only to primary-sector businesses or to non-primary projects as well.
The committee welcomed language in the draft indicating county support for federal low-income housing programs and said that lack of county participation could block some affordable housing projects. “If they don't support those kind of projects, we simply won't get them,” a speaker said, noting the local need for senior housing.
Edits and comments on the draft are expected to be provided to county staff and the draft will remain a work in progress. The committee treated the item as informational and directed staff to return any clarifications received from the county to the EDIC for its next packet.
