Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Records topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

District staff lists four FOIA requests received and responses provided on personnel and contracts

5826674 · September 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The administration read four Freedom of Information Act requests filed in September seeking vendor contracts for alternative transportation, principal and teacher contracts, contracted rates for therapy and paras, and a staff listing. One request had been responded to by the district on Sept. 17.

District staff read four FOIA requests submitted to the Harlem School District in September and summarized the status of responses.

The requests listed were:

- A Sept. 9, 2025 request from Justine Winnie seeking contracts or master service agreements and associated purchase orders for vendors providing alternative transportation in the past three years; the district planned to respond by Sept. 16, 2025.

- A Sept. 8, 2025 request from Owen Wayne asking for copies of contracts for all school principals and copies of active teacher contracts and collective bargaining agreements; the district had not yet responded at the time of the meeting.

- A Sept. 12, 2025 request from Maureen Garcia asking for contractual rates for vendors contracted for speech-language pathologists, social workers, psychologists, behavior analysts, paraprofessionals and registered behavior technicians; staff said they would respond soon.

- A Sept. 16, 2025 request from Jamie Jordan seeking a listing of all district employees (first/last name, email, title/position, and primary campus or department); staff said the district responded to that request on Sept. 17, 2025 with the inclusive documents.

The board recorded the list of FOIA requests as part of the meeting’s public record; no substantive discussion or disputes about the requests were recorded during the meeting.