Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County attorney says renewable-energy moratorium review, notices of claim and a court dismissal are pending
Summary
Montezuma County's attorney updated commissioners that the county is working on draft land-use amendments for renewable energy before an Oct. 15 moratorium expiration, received additional notices of claim tied to a March traffic accident, and obtained a court order dismissing a subdivision lawsuit filed by Ellis Lewis.
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Montezuma County’s attorney, Steven Tarnowski, told commissioners on Sept. 23 the county is preparing draft amendments to the land-use code governing renewable-energy development because a moratorium the board enacted is set to expire Oct. 15.
Tarnowski said staff and planning will "really try to make a good faith effort to get something back to the board" before the moratorium expires; if not, the board may need to hold another public hearing to extend the moratorium. He also reported receiving another notice of claim last week related to a March traffic accident on Highway 491; that was the third notice of claim tied to that incident and may precede litigation. Separately, Tarnowski said the county obtained a court order granting his office's motion to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Ellis Lewis challenging a subdivision denial.
Tarnowski recommended county staff continue coordination with planning on possible code changes and said his office expects a busier court schedule in the coming weeks for child-protection-related matters and other civil cases. He also suggested restarting a county tire-collection cleanup with public health, noting the county previously collected more than 30,000 tires in a similar event.
Why it matters: upcoming code amendments could affect renewable energy proposals in the county; notices of claim potentially indicate pending litigation tied to a traffic incident; the court dismissal resolves one land-use challenge for the board.
Commissioners did not take immediate action; staff will return with draft code language or with options to extend the moratorium if needed.

